The New York Times‘s brief experiment with Chinese social media has come to an abrupt end. The company’s official account on Sina Weibo, China’s popular Twitter-like microblogging service, has been deleted after less than a week.
The Times‘s Chinese website remains unblocked. That may indicate Beijing sees social media as inherently more dangerous than static web content, as TechCrunchsuggested.
More likely, Sina simply deleted the account preemptively. The company falls under the purview of China’s Internet regulations, but relies on self-censorship to enforce them. The decision to block an entire domain — such as cn.nytimes.com — would presumably come from a high-level government agency, such as the State Council Information Office or the Chinese Communist Party’s Propaganda Department.
The company’s presence on other Chinese social media, such as messaging service QQ and gaming siteSohu have also disappeared, though the Times never officially confirmed those accounts.
This isn’t the first time the company’s Sina Weibo account has disappeared. Shortly after its launch last week, the account briefly disappeared, only to mysteriously reappear a few hours later. It accrued about 12,000 readers before getting deleted again earlier today. Sina Weibo did not give any explanation for the blockage, and it’s unclear if the Times broke any rules in the microblogging company’s new user contract.
The Chinese version of the The Times launched on June 28. It features a mixture of translated articles and original reporting. The paper’s goal is to provide “high-quality coverage of world affairs, business and culture,” for the country’s growing middle class, which the Times called “educated, affluent, global citizens.”
The New York Times Company has made clear it won’t engage in the type of self-censorship employed by Sina Weibo.
“We’re not tailoring it to the demands of the Chinese government, so we’re not operating like a Chinese media company,” Editor Joseph Kahn told the company’s Media Decoder blog.”China operates a very vigorous firewall. We have no control over that. We hope and expect that Chinese officials will welcome what we’re doing.”
Source: mashable.com (03/07/2012)